Evidence That Survives the Courtroom
Proposed Federal Rule 707 will require Daubert-style reliability hearings for AI-generated evidence. Courts are excluding digital exhibits with incomplete chain-of-custody documentation. The bar has never been higher. Vipernauts delivers investigation-grade intelligence where every claim is sourced, every inference documented, and every exhibit stress-tested against opposing arguments before they're made.
Pain Points We Solve
Unreliable Digital Evidence
Defense attorneys target collection, access, and modification logs — and courts are excluding evidence where chain-of-custody documentation falls short. The old standards of authentication are no longer sufficient for digital artifacts.
AI Evidence Under Scrutiny
Proposed Federal Rule 707 will require Daubert-style reliability hearings for AI-generated evidence — proving adequate data inputs, reliable methods, and valid results. AI outputs without transparent methodology face exclusion before they reach a jury.
Multi-Jurisdiction Requirements
Cases involving international financial flows require evidence meeting the standards of multiple jurisdictions simultaneously. Citation styles, exhibit labeling, certification language — each country's rules differ, and a package built for one court may be inadmissible in another.
Platform Capabilities
Full-Provenance Evidence
Under FRE Rule 901, improperly authenticated evidence faces exclusion. Every data element in Vipernauts carries a complete audit trail — origin, access, transformation, and reasoning — satisfying the most stringent judicial requirements for digital evidence admissibility.
Adversarial Fortification
Evidence that hasn't been attacked is a hypothesis, not evidence. Every claim is stress-tested against counter-hypotheses and alternative explanations before it reaches your desk — so cross-examination makes your case stronger, not weaker.
Court-Ready Package Generation
One investigation, multiple jurisdictions. Automated generation of prosecution briefs, expert reports, and exhibit packages formatted to jurisdiction-specific requirements with complete citation chains and chain-of-custody documentation.
Key Capabilities
Zero-Hallucination AI
Courts are right to be skeptical of AI-generated analysis. Every statement is grounded in verified source material with mandatory attribution and independent verification — built for the standard that proposed Rule 707 will demand.
Interactive Evidence Timelines
Chronological visualization of events with drill-down from summary to individual source documents and transactions. Jurors see the narrative. Judges see the methodology. Opposing counsel sees an unbreakable chain.
Multi-Jurisdiction Formatting
Evidence packages automatically formatted to the specific requirements of each target jurisdiction — citation styles, exhibit labeling, and certification language. One investigation, multiple courts, zero reformatting.
Defense Preparation Tools
Deepfakes don't distort reality — they fabricate it entirely. Use the same adversarial testing capabilities to evaluate opposing evidence, challenge authentication, and identify weaknesses before trial.
Methodology Documentation
Comprehensive documentation of analytical methods and decision processes. Built to survive a Daubert hearing — proving adequate data inputs, reliable methods, and valid outputs as AI evidence standards tighten.